<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>TagShadow Forum &#187; Tag: pern - Recent Posts</title>
		<link>http://tagshadow.com/forum/tags/pern</link>
		<description>a quantitative visual SFF book recommendation ... thingy</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://tagshadow.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://tagshadow.com/forum/rss/tags/pern" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>MentatJack on "Classification and Spoilers"</title>
			<link>http://tagshadow.com/forum/topic/classification-and-spoilers#post-15</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MentatJack</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15@http://tagshadow.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Talking with a friend just now, a particularly good example of this came up:  Endings.  Some people prefer books with happy endings and others prefer depressing endings.  Sometimes knowing, even in such broad strokes, how a story ends might feel like a spoiler, but often it's just another useful way to categorize a book.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MentatJack on "Classification and Spoilers"</title>
			<link>http://tagshadow.com/forum/topic/classification-and-spoilers#post-14</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MentatJack</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">14@http://tagshadow.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Spoilers have always annoyed me.  Both when reading and when writing reviews of books, the line between knowing what a book is about and knowing enough to not even need to read the book can be rather thin.  This happens quite a bit when you tag things.  The main categorization of a book is usually safe.  Tagging &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/076534825X?ie=UTF8&#38;amp;tag=tagshadow-20&#38;amp;linkCode=as2&#38;amp;camp=1789&#38;amp;creative=390957&#38;amp;creativeASIN=076534825X&#34;&#62;Spin&#60;/a&#62; by Robert Charles Wilson science fiction is in no way a spoiler, but tagging it &#60;a href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_uplift&#34;&#62;uplift&#60;/a&#62; probably is.  It's a perfect tag, but that aspect of the story appears rather late in the timeline and might thus be considered a spoiler.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I can think of other books where tagging them science fiction instead of fantasy could be considered spoilers.  The original &#60;a href=&#34;http://tagshadow.com/amazon/pca.php?tagId=4326&#34;&#62;Pern&#60;/a&#62; trilogy comes to mind.  There are plenty of examples where the question of science vs magic or alien vs religion is the central mystery.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It strikes me that one benefit of the TagShadow method of recommendation (browsing through clusters of similar books) to an extent protects the reader from the potential spoilers contained in a tag cloud about the book.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>

